and other is adding things to say to this, wich hasn't ''ended'' becouse it's not an event.
again, you avoided my point of what you were trying to say.
and it's not been 1 topic lately.
either way bumping a 2 year old topic is still bumping it, wheather it's adding something to it or not. by your words non event topics can be bumped.
end of.
oh nice edit there.
personally i don't see what's so BAD about posting something like "i'm in" in a locked event, you make it sound like it's the end of the world. OH NO SOMEBODY POSTED TWO WORDS IN A FINISHED EVENT, LET'S KILL HIM!!! if you were here for as long as i have been and done as much as me you would have some kind of right to get involved in my problems, but you don't.
Actually, if something it's bad, it's bad, and if it is, I'm gonna say it, I don't care if you are snoops or the president, becouse with that criterion, people can do whatever they would like to becouse ''nobody can get involved in their problems'' so let everyone do what they want. The thing is, you can't do whatever you want in this world, there are rules to follow. Aand, I repeat, I didn't say you deserved to be killed or something like that as you said, I just said that is less wrong to bump a topic once adding something to the conversation, than bumping more than one just becouse to bump.
I REPEAT, BOTH ARE WRONG, IT'S JUST THAT ONE IS LESS WRONG THAN THE OTHER.