Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - MadMax

Pages: 1 ... 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 [23] 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 ... 271
331
Off-Topic / Re: Funny Videos/Pictures
« on: April 03, 2015, 03:37:08 pm »

332
Off-Topic / Re: Interesting Videos/Pictures
« on: April 02, 2015, 06:50:45 pm »
landing speed (depending on plane) for these jet is usually from 200 to 300 km/h

333
Off-Topic / Re: Funny Videos/Pictures
« on: April 01, 2015, 08:11:31 pm »
2 most well-known songs on YouTube in 1
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SQoA_wjmE9w[/youtube]

334
Off-Topic / Re: Funny Videos/Pictures
« on: March 28, 2015, 11:54:11 pm »
b...b-but h...how??!?!?


335
Off-Topic / Re: News topic
« on: March 27, 2015, 02:35:39 pm »
Problem here is that a concept of a show is intellectual property. You can't just "copy" a show.

Well, as far as I know, current concept was Clarkson's idea.

Previous Top Gear form was casual auto-program about technical stuff. Clarkson 'invented' current concept and form of show. BBC only gave money and materials to make his ideas take course.

336
AdrenalineX Development / Re: Idea For Low FPS
« on: March 26, 2015, 10:17:28 pm »
MadMax and others proved that it is possible to abuse it in any race where acceleration is crucial.

not acceleration but top speed. Acceleration on 30 fps is slow as hell compared to 90, so only races where top speed is main factor, where these indeed give more speed (for unknown reasons)

337
Off-Topic / Re: #Photos of AdrenalineX Players!
« on: March 24, 2015, 11:39:43 pm »
I cut coz
1) italy was fucking hot,
2) and generally they caused annoying problems in wind or rain,
3) in additions they made uncomfortable to work on car's engine creating risky situations

338
Off-Topic / Re: #Photos of AdrenalineX Players!
« on: March 24, 2015, 09:55:56 pm »
In Venice :)



haha in Venice too:


btw, nice jacket

339
Suggestions / Re: checkpoints
« on: March 24, 2015, 09:47:08 pm »
up to drivers, some hate extra load on roof, some don't care.

340
AdrenalineX Development / Re: Ban duel
« on: March 07, 2015, 05:05:41 pm »
I remember created a race with it and everyone got auto-banned lol.

341
AdrenalineX Development / Re: Ban duel
« on: March 06, 2015, 08:47:03 pm »
No one wants to be banned but it adds meaning to the duel. Even people against this should at least see that it would definitely be one of the most thrilling ways to duel.
thats right, kind of 'pink-slips' race... since you are unable to race when you 'lose car' (tampban)

342
Off-Topic / Re: Funny Videos/Pictures
« on: February 28, 2015, 02:17:02 pm »
still rollong on floor.
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EsBC-vF0ZeU[/youtube]

343
General Server Discussion / Re: Is this possible for the server?
« on: February 26, 2015, 03:03:14 am »
move AdrenalineX to Minecraft

SA (well Los Santos at least) is almost done, LOL

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CoL0MIVYv5c[/youtube]

344
point is to make track actually be fluent, in sensible shape... take a look on tracks in any other games or even real motorsports. here Adelaide F1/V8 Supercars track for example:


Monaco track, for many people considern as best track in whole F1 - strictly directed by terrain shape, pretty fast with few technical corners that are created by terrain, not really 'forced' added on straights.


i don't know how to explain it better, but somehow to make more speed feeling... hmm
take a look on mostly switch races, and way how they are designed

focused on street-tracks coz these are closes thing to AX. Track racing isn't that possible without mta custom objects

345
kind of understand this guy

there are plenty of races with actually unnecessary corners that aren't blending well into fluent race track route. Example explained here:

MRS by Switch - fast turns and few starights, pretty much enjoyable race track, looks smooth and complex, well tought.


Random track based on MSR but with added plenty of unnecessary corners in areas where they aren't actually needed


Note marked basic track shape, in both cases it's same, yet 2nd got plenty of unnnecessary corners in areas where they do not add anything but extra frustration anf 'fake' way to make it longer, yet main track shape is same so.

If this is what OP meant... if no, then ignore this post.

EDIT: pictures had problems with loading.

Pages: 1 ... 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 [23] 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 ... 271