Messages

1

General Server Discussion / Re: Should we rename the server to AdrenalineTwitter?

« on: September 12, 2023, 05:33:23 pm »

100% yes

2

Off-Topic / Re: #Photos of AdrenalineX Players!

« on: May 30, 2023, 08:59:45 pm »

Yoo long time no see!

3

General Server Discussion / ADRENALINE X REUNION

« on: January 17, 2021, 09:44:13 pm »

So as many of you will now be aware, we've been organising an AdrenalineX reunion over at https://www.facebook.com/groups/157114372596589. If you have facebook, go ahead and join that group, as it's where most of the discussion is happening. So far we have just short of 50 members interested, so it should be a good 'un.

We're thinking the evening of Sunday 24th January, UK time (which is approx a week today). If you have suggestions for a better time, drop em either here or in the group. Other than that, just show up!

Spread the word to any players you might still be in contact with; I'll be updating this post as more stuff gets decided on.

4

General Server Discussion / Re: Hey

« on: January 17, 2021, 09:39:35 pm »

Yooooo

5

Help & Resources / Re: SIGHMOAN’S FORGOTTEN DETAILS

« on: January 16, 2021, 07:43:18 pm »

Great stuff, thanks nos

6

Help & Resources / SIGHMOAN’S FORGOTTEN DETAILS

« on: January 16, 2021, 12:59:10 am »

Yeah so I’m posting on behalf of Simon here because he’s forgot his account details for the server and forums. Canny remember if there’s already a thread for this so apologies if there is.

As far as he can remember, his server name is [MAF]Sighmoan and his forum name is either that or bob cratchet.

Can we do anything about it?

Edit: forum name confirmed Bob Cratchet, his profile is below
http://forum.adrenalinex.co.uk/index.php?action=profile;u=260


Edit 2: Love is also looking for his login details on forum. His profile is below but it doesn’t tell him what his forum login name is
http://forum.adrenalinex.co.uk/index.php?action=profile;u=415

7

General Server Discussion / Re: So guys...

« on: February 15, 2019, 03:46:53 pm »

Guys if you joined forum: write in this topic

Check it yo

8

Suggestions / Re: Suggestions - ghostmode/time trial

« on: January 02, 2018, 11:38:10 pm »

GM for every TT race is drastic as fuck but I'd support it as an option for /tt, so long as the race maker selects it. Since /tt is 99% rec whoring anyway I see no reason why the option of racing against the top 5 ghosts wouldn't be worth consideration

9

Off-Topic / Re: Interesting Videos/Pictures

« on: May 11, 2017, 06:19:52 pm »

The pics at the end are mind-blowing
[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uSUOdu_5MPc[/youtube]

10

Suggestions / Re: /startvote [racename]

« on: February 17, 2017, 01:19:28 pm »

Erm.. Let's just make invisible votes, lottery type. People gonna vote out of 6 or 7 races having no clue what they are and the race with most votes randomly wins lol. Simple and no brain fucking

You mean instead of the voting system we have now? Cos if so we may as well scrap voting altogether and have a random race each time

11

Suggestions / Re: /startvote [racename]

« on: February 17, 2017, 08:21:03 am »

Or a command like /redo that should work on a similar way, I mean like 60% (or 50% +1) of the ppl have to vote and the race is restarted... and yes to prevent abusing it will be possible to do only once per race so ppl won't restart the same race for more than one time, I mean you will have to vote the same race using /vote when it appears in the menu to be able to use that command again, also maybe it is good if that command won't be available for longer races.

theres used to be a restart vote after every race, it was removed a while ago because people voted to restart just about everything

Was gonna say exactly this. Every single race would be played twice, so if we were to bring this back it'd definitely need a cooldown period. But if we're doing anything like that, we may as well go the whole mile with /startvote.

What would happen if 2 or more players start to load long SK?

Unless I'm misunderstanding you, it wouldn't matter if two players vote for Long SK. They'd also need at least 50 percent of people online to vote it. Obviously we'd need to deactivate the feature if there are less than 3 players online since that'd mean one vote is more than half.

Why dont you just start giving VIP benifits. One benifit could be /starvote. Admins should be given the same benifit.
I would donate, if you start giving VIP benifits.

The last thing we wanna do is turn aX into a pay2play game. People can donate if they genuinely care about the server's future and have enough money spare to do it, not just to buy perks. If we come up with some sorta fun, new feature, it'd be absurd to alienate people from using it.

Especially considering the future of aX is in the new players. We need to appeal to them, and making people pay if they want full access to what we offer is a great way to do the complete opposite.

12

Suggestions / Re: /startvote [racename]

« on: February 16, 2017, 01:14:57 am »

Really good posting like its your ideas, it happens in MTA, those vote things using your money. If you want this go to MTA and stop being Steve Jobs of AX.

I dunno if i follow... is this you accusing me of intentionally trying to steal ideas or something?

edit: double post, oops.. fook it

13

Suggestions / Re: /startvote [racename]

« on: February 16, 2017, 01:12:58 am »

reasonable

this is why just voting will never work. everyone has their own idea of reasonable, a bunch of noobs joining forces to put the server in IV or SK mode for 2 hours might seem fun to them, but for many others leaving the server is a better option. i find buying races to be a better idea because reasons, but the cooldown on it should be atleast 24 hours per player.

That's the magic of the cooldown though, we can allow it to happen only as much as we see fit. If there's a price on top of that then it's something to spend money on. It'll need a fair bit of thought behind it, granted. But the idea has potential.

With this system, by default everyone who doesn't actively vote for the race will essentially be a vote against it. If more than half the server votes FOR it, on the other hand, that's a respectable majority and loading the race is clearly in the collective's interest. Considering the fact you've gotta pay to start a vote, the fact that you can only do it once every so often, and the sheer luck you'd need for literally half of the server to actively type /vote or whatever, I think you'd be surprised how little it'd actually happen. But the fact that there's even a slight chance will keep people engaged in the same way the lottery does.

14

Suggestions / Re: /startvote [racename]

« on: February 15, 2017, 06:26:59 pm »

I guess we could combine the two and charge to start a vote. That'd solve the overuse issue and give people a reason to try to earn money, as well as prompting people to suggest reasonable races because they know they've wasted their money if people don't vote in their favour.

15

Suggestions / /startvote [racename]

« on: February 15, 2017, 06:03:25 pm »

I reckon it'd be cool if players could start a vote for a track they like, something like this:

Steve types /startvote clip

"**Server: Steve suggests Clip as the next race. To vote for it, type /vote" (or some other command since /vote is already in use)

If more than half the server votes in favour, the race gets loaded. This way, players wouldn't need to spam admins if they want a race loading; they could let the server decide for itself. It also means admins don't have to be present for races to be loaded. It's win-win

Only possible downside is overuse, but that can be easily fixed by making it so after a suggested race wins the vote, the command can't be used for another 10 minutes/hour/whatever