Messages

91

General Server Discussion / Re: here

« on: February 12, 2012, 11:33:33 pm »

You already said that you wouldn't reply... it seems that you may have some personal issues

92

General Server Discussion / Re: here

« on: February 12, 2012, 11:27:04 pm »

A personal attack is usually against the arguer himself... Not the reasons or things said by the arguer.

You're thinking too hard

93

General Server Discussion / Re: here

« on: February 12, 2012, 11:11:52 pm »

I deny your accusations.

94

General Server Discussion / Re: here

« on: February 12, 2012, 11:04:14 pm »

Was there a need to steer away from your poor reasoning?
Into why i used your poor reason?

All i can infer from this is that rather than counter arguing my quote, you'd rather argue why i have chosen your reason.

Seems like you have muddled your self up... 

you've just raised a trivial argument to steer away from your poor reasoning

95

General Server Discussion / Re: here

« on: February 12, 2012, 10:51:10 pm »

fact still remains that you targeted me by pointing out the only weak post of mine and not looking through the rest of the thread. bish bash bosh job done.

After all, i target your reason.... not Snoops in particular.

Facts remains that i targeted a poor reason. and by pointing out the weak reason, it just so happens to be a poor reason by you.

96

General Server Discussion / Re: here

« on: February 12, 2012, 10:46:55 pm »

Let me reassure you.

You are not a particular target i'm aiming for.

It just so happens that your comment is on the first page of the thread and clearly visible.

Now that i have reassured you, you should no longer have miss-directed thoughts of why i used your comment as a example of a poor reason, unless you still want to argue otherwise...

97

General Server Discussion / Re: here

« on: February 12, 2012, 09:55:03 pm »

It just so happens to be that a weak reasoning goes by under your name lol... had it been someone else... i would've quoted him or her 

98

General Server Discussion / Re: here

« on: February 12, 2012, 09:41:47 pm »

Will there be a point when he learns?

99

General Server Discussion / Re: here

« on: February 12, 2012, 09:35:46 pm »

if you can't be bothered to check through through the whole thread then don't say i" couldn't find any other members saying such weak reasons compared to
you" you just made yourself look like a complete cockface, well done lol

A bit ironic through your "cockfaced" reasoning...
i was hoping by saying that, it would leave you the job to found such a "cockfaced" reason comparable to your own one   

oh yeah... snoops... i also mentioned "i may be wrong", just to let you know so you don't get too happy

100

General Server Discussion / Re: here

« on: February 12, 2012, 09:26:07 pm »

"Let me quote some other things said by other forum members..."

yet you only quote me?

votes says unban for runty, so like it or not he will have to get unbanned

i'm sorry for only quoting you, but i couldn't find any other members saying such weak reasons compared to you... i may be wrong lol  (i'm not bothered to browse the whole thread..)

we'll have to wait and see

101

General Server Discussion / Re: here

« on: February 12, 2012, 09:01:23 pm »

you could have just said "runty's situation was slightly different because there was more aggression involved"

instead of trying to sound really smart

I could've said "runty's situation was slightly different because there was more aggression involved"
but i guess i left you the pleasure of simplifying it for yourself, after all... if i had broken it down, i reckon you would find another issue (if so according to you) to find and complain about 

i understand "pissed-off Ush, rather than a debating Ush", and i understand that it is hard to hold a neutral position when banning people

Let me quote some other things said by other forum members...

because they can't handle his sometimes over the top sense of humour

Now, handling "over the top sense of humour" and handling uncalled for random insults are different. I recall when i was new on the server (still am) that Runty had said some incredibly grim things and such... like mentioning how i should go to an admin's house and fuck the admin's mother with the admin himself (not mentioning which admin for the sake of it)

Having been banned multiple times already should have gave him a clear heads up for what is coming...
he could've learnt the reasons why he was banned... or maybe he ignored them. But if he has been banned several times already for the same reasons, then he most does deserve a permanent ban despite whether it was a pissed-off ush or a debating-ush

102

General Server Discussion / Re: here

« on: February 12, 2012, 07:54:16 pm »

Exactly, that's pretty much what I'm doing here yet I'm not getting banned for it.

Your use of reasoning takes the context of the situation runty was in, and to compare it to what you are doing here
and this is quite an unfair analogy...
it may be what you are doing here (showing loyalty) can be slightly comparable to runty's situation, but the context and level of aggravation the situation runty was in, is incomparable with what you are standing for here. Hence why you are not banned...

103

Off-Topic / Re: What are you listening to now?

« on: February 10, 2012, 07:43:30 am »

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gbhr_GbR1EM[/youtube]

104

Off-Topic / Re: Arguing thread

« on: February 10, 2012, 07:40:02 am »

here is the current motion...
“European countries should take a lead from France and ban the burka”

do you agree with this, or do you disagree?

according to Nicolas Sarkozy, he states to outlaw the full veil because it "runs counter to women's dignity.”

lol.... let's see you two argue about this

105

Off-Topic / Re: FoodForLuis

« on: February 09, 2012, 08:06:29 am »

Children...