AdrenalineX Forums
General => AdrenalineX Development => Suggestions => Topic started by: Scorpion. on June 29, 2013, 09:44:50 am
-
Hello, im here for explain my suggest.
my idea if is possble do a script, for the new tracks in the server with the voting system like Add & delete ,at end of every New tracks.
Will be more easy for admins and the players, and what wins the vote , gets decided.
sorry for my english like a kid of 5 years old
-
/rating does already implement that. maybe a message for reminding players they can vote to del or add by doing that?
-
not going to happen.
people aren't objective enough to judge races based on just votes, the level 2 admin is here to see when the votes go off and become biased and then react accordingly.
-
not going to happen.
people aren't objective enough to judge races based on just votes, the level 3 admin is here to see when the votes go off and become biased and then react accordingly.
level 3
level 3
:'(
-
agree with Karlis, some players can vote negative cause they failed or dont like supergt though race was good.
-
not going to happen.
people aren't objective enough to judge races based on just votes, the level 3 admin is here to see when the votes go off and become biased and then react accordingly.
level 3
level 3
:'(
oops lol, fixed.
-
We already have enough retards who votes /dislike with no reason (/me runs).. Bad idea
-
/rating does already implement that. maybe a message for reminding players they can vote to del or add by doing that?
We already have enough retards who votes /dislike with no reason (/me runs).. Bad idea
I don't see on the server, the new tracks get decised by like and dislike, i see ever the admins say : add or del?(question) at end of every new tracks...
/rating is a subjective decision and not objective one ,for me.
An example:
tracks with super gt with rain have almost 60% of dislike but like me likes these tracks.
not going to happen.
people aren't objective enough to judge races based on just votes, the level 2 admin is here to see when the votes go off and become biased and then react accordingly.
agree with Karlis, some players can vote negative cause they failed or dont like supergt though race was good.
Yeah , i quote with you guys.
-
I agree with Cysio & Karlis & Scorpion & Mizar & Snoopy.
-
Honesty I think there's no objective way to rate a race. Its own name says: rating; it's totally open to a variety of opinions.
A race should be assessed depending on how easy it's for all players to pass successfully. I have hundred of view points about the same race related to the vehicle it's used, the weather they set, the city we're in and how long it takes to finish. That's mainly the reason I use /Like and /Dislike to remember a race which I enjoyed or not. After I type, it appears on the menu assigning a (L) or (D), so it helps me to avoid voting for what I don't want to.
In an unadorned way, it's pretty hard to rate sincerely a race, so you all shouldn't care so much about what people say unreasonably but what they can explain reasonably and your experience tells you.
-
It is good the way it is imo. I agree with Toretes words.
-
Honesty I think there's no objective way to rate a race. Its own name says: rating; it's totally open to a variety of opinions.
A race should be assessed depending on how easy it's for all players to pass successfully. I have hundred of view points about the same race related to the vehicle it's used, the weather they set, the city we're in and how long it takes to finish. That's mainly the reason I use /Like and /Dislike to remember a race which I enjoyed or not. After I type, it appears on the menu assigning a (L) or (D), so it helps me to avoid voting for what I don't want to.
In an unadorned way, it's pretty hard to rate sincerely a race, so you all shouldn't care so much about what people say unreasonably but what they can explain reasonably and your experience tells you.
true, but
A race should be assessed depending on how easy it's for all players to pass successfully.
isn't really true, race being easy or hard was never our goal, goal is to provide challenge and/or entertain. it all comes down to the other words that you said, its all relative and subjective. however admins rating the races are here to rule out the obvious subjective factors and give this otherwise purely subjective rating a bit of objective foundation.
-
Honesty I think there's no objective way to rate a race. Its own name says: rating; it's totally open to a variety of opinions.
A race should be assessed depending on how easy it's for all players to pass successfully. I have hundred of view points about the same race related to the vehicle it's used, the weather they set, the city we're in and how long it takes to finish. That's mainly the reason I use /Like and /Dislike to remember a race which I enjoyed or not. After I type, it appears on the menu assigning a (L) or (D), so it helps me to avoid voting for what I don't want to.
In an unadorned way, it's pretty hard to rate sincerely a race, so you all shouldn't care so much about what people say unreasonably but what they can explain reasonably and your experience tells you.
true, but
A race should be assessed depending on how easy it's for all players to pass successfully.
isn't really true, race being easy or hard was never our goal, goal is to provide challenge and/or entertain. it all comes down to the other words that you said, its all relative and subjective. however admins rating the races are here to rule out the obvious subjective factors and give this otherwise purely subjective rating a bit of objective foundation.
Oh, you misunderstood my words (probably didn't express correctly). I didn't mean to be easy to race but to be bearable, able to be done without too many interruptions or troubles in your way. It's a fact that most of admins reject (or send to /TT) a race when it's bumpy, tricky or find too many bugs on it, and that's what I actually meant.
It's obvious that a race hasn't got to be easy, basically because most of them get boring as hell at the very first minute ("our goal is to provide challenge and/or entertain"), but it's also true that I found dozen of races which should be burned. That's mainly what I wanted to say :P
-
We already have enough retards who votes /dislike with no reason (/me runs).. Bad idea
people can say "del" just as easily as they can type /dislike, i think there should be a better way of adding/deleting races.
earlier in the week, everyone was saying "add" to a race, and then fucktard said "race is boring, del" and it was deleted, despite the fact the majority of people said add. it's not really fully efficient atm, it's just a rough guess at how many people want it added or deleted.
obviously there will be some people who just vote del for no reason, but i think the majority of the people online will give an honest vote.
-
i think ,who have 10,000 point scores can says add o del racing , becouse the newbie can't get a good decision.
-
i think ,who have 10,000 point scores can says add o del racing , becouse the newbie can get a good decision.
I would rather let vote only those who have finished the race, or at least have raced a half or 3/4 of it..I say this because I see a lot of people, even regulars and top-score players, saying "DEL" after the first turn or cp, and most of the times those races get actually added..
-
I would rather let vote only those who have finished the race, or at least have raced a half or 3/4 of it..I say this because I see a lot of people, even regulars and top-score players, saying "DEL" after the first turn or cp, and most of the times those races get actually added..
yeah this would be the way to go about it, have it appear in the same way the vote for the next race appears.
-
i think ,who have 10,000 point scores can says add o del racing , becouse the newbie can't get a good decision.
I would rather let vote only those who have finished the race, or at least have raced a half or 3/4 of it..I say this because I see a lot of people, even regulars and top-score players, saying "DEL" after the first turn or cp, and most of the times those races get actually added..
lol,becouse they fail at first cp ,it's rage :L
-
ye only ones who finished race should be able to rate it
same about current system, i see lot of ppl rating races bad even before start, just when they see vehicle used in
-
ye only ones who finished race should be able to rate it
so if the grid is shit you still have to finish it, while it's clear that it is shit?
and.. when cp1 is on a place you can't reach or very bad..
-
so if the grid is shit you still have to finish it, while it's clear that it is shit?
and.. when cp1 is on a place you can't reach or very bad..
in that situation you don't even need to rate it cause an admin should delete it straight away
-
actually i agree with max.
if race is impossible to finish, it should be deleted and deleted races doesn't need a rating.
but if race is possible to finish, restricting it this way makes votes less hater-friendly.