Messages

61

Unban Requests / Re: Banned

« on: May 02, 2013, 05:08:41 pm »

The speedhack was very clear (on P_Nanard) 2 days ago, and later I saw also some weapon hacks (on T_Nanard) too. We have a strict policy against hacks, there is no second chance, case closed.

Just out of curiosity, what were your previous nicknames for 4-5 years?

62

Suggestions / Re: Triple suggestion

« on: April 26, 2013, 12:46:02 pm »

Yes, as Karlis said. There already is this exclusion anyway, my suggestion is just to make it a little bit more strict. Also, I had another thought, would it be possible to make the ping limit possible only for /race and/or for rush hours: for example whenever there are over 20 players online, the ping limit is 350 in /race mode and 500 in other modes. Whenever there are less than 20 players online, it's 500 even in /race, or maybe 400 for /race and 500 for the rest. With a warning at some point (when kicked?) to tell the players they may get a higher ping limit when not in /race so it doesn't bother other racers...

Also, the way there could be exceptions would be for example all admins get immunity because they (have to) spend time speccing for cheaters instead of racing, I know some players spend very little time actually racing...

Anyway it seems this suggestion is not much appreciated, that's alright I kind of expected it but I just wanted to see if/how many there would be favorable opinions. Any comments on the other suggestions? Improvements/critis?

63

Suggestions / Triple suggestion

« on: April 25, 2013, 09:14:46 pm »

1: flip in IV
2: ping limit
3: stunt worlds

1- When building a IV race, could it be possible to toggle ON ability to use /f ?

2- What do you think of lowering the ping limit (currently 500, make it about 350 or 400)? I see many players even from South America have a ping usually around 250 so even for them 350-400 is a high ping... and it's quite a mess for everyone especially in one world races.

3- Last one, I had already suggested it a while ago on server so idk if it's still remembered, it's for stunt, I had the idea while seeing some players getting annoyed in stunt by others DMing them with hunter/hydra...
It would be nice to have stunt worlds working kind of like groups (we have that for chat) / freeroam: a player may enter his own stunt world, choose if he wants or not to have the stunt maps added (on freeroam they're not available, it'd be nice to have the choice?), have the ability to /stuntinvite ID, and the invited player could /joinstunt ID when invited, and last detail, the host of the stunt world could set the special features for everybody, or choose to leave them free (I think it could be nice if we have some events such as destruction derby, the host is the only one to be able to use stunt commands, can set no autorepair, hardcore mode if possible and so on, so nobody "cheats").

64

Unban Requests / Re: Administrator abused his position!

« on: April 23, 2013, 12:44:55 am »

Tell me where did anyone say you deserve to get unbanned before 28th of april in that topic? As I said, I guess the admin who edited your topic made a mistake, and I repeat, NOBODY said in that topic you should be unbanned before, so there is no reason you would.

I will not comment your accusations, I think anyone who has read the topic knows which person is more trustworthy here

In short:
Banned until april 28th evening because of tempban for flaming and spamming and evading the tempban.

Today's ban evade should have been +7 more days of ban, but because it was an admin's mistake, it doesn't count. You're welcome. Now that it is clear, any further ban evading will add 7 days.

65

Unban Requests / Re: Administrator abused his position!

« on: April 23, 2013, 12:30:00 am »

I read the forum

http://forum.adrenalinex.co.uk/index.php/topic,5333.0.html

In this topic it says you will be unbanned on april 28th.

Obviously, an admin has made a mistake by changing your topic title to UNBANNED as NOBODY in the topic said you would be unbanned before that date. I do not request to add 7 more days for evading as I see the mistake was from an admin's side, but you are not unbanned, nobody said you would be unbanned before april 28th in the evening.

"Read the forum first and foremost", you know well what was in the topic, as you said it's a lack of communication, instead of asking for confirmation you pick the situation that suits you more and call others abusers. No wonder you're a guy who made a video of his cheats, you clearly love annoying people.

66

Unban Requests / Re: Intsu unban apply

« on: April 21, 2013, 02:45:52 pm »

Alright, the ip is very very similar which leaves only a very tiny possibility that it's not you, but because it's a one year old ban and there are not that many different IP ranges in Estonia, I accept to let you play.

Please wait for some higher level admin to unban you (it'll be written on the topic title [UNBANNED] when it's done).

67

Unban Requests / Re: False Ban by ...

« on: April 20, 2013, 02:03:34 pm »

Anyway the mistakes were clear:

- Kick was because you spammed the reports (even if you're sure it's a hacker, you mustn't spam it, one time is enough)
- 48h tempban because of the flaming
- +7 days ban for evading

Unban on sunday 28th of april in late evening (UK time).

Any evade before you get unbanned will cost +7 days of ban.

68

Unban Requests / Re: False Ban by ...

« on: April 19, 2013, 11:40:46 pm »

First you reported somebody who had very heavy lags. It's ok, it looks like hacks but it's not, mistakes happen. But then you spammed again the report, so I kicked you.

You come back and here's what you say:

Coloxx_[GT] [9]: wtffffffff!
Coloxx_[GT] [9]: hablo español.
Coloxx_[GT] [9]: el pelotudo
Coloxx_[GT] [9]: me ramea y me buela
Coloxx_[GT] [9]: y los admins de mierda no hacen un choto
Coloxx_[GT] [9]: puro fap
Coloxx_[GT] [9]: ponganse las pilas


So I banned you for 48h for flaming.
Then you evaded the ban, so I banned you again, any ban evade adds a week to the initial ban.

69

Unban Requests / Re: Intsu unban apply

« on: April 13, 2013, 08:58:16 pm »

Because of this:
29462   23/04/12 15:38   Estonia 88.196.203.83   Lionel_Raimla   [MAF]musicloveR   speedhack

70

Off-Topic / Re: Funny Videos/Pictures

« on: April 08, 2013, 06:45:10 pm »

Putin's visit to Merkel in Hanover (Germany)...


Vlady' apparently declared later: "I appreciated a lot. I couldn't really hear what they were shouting because of the security service that acts with a lot of brutality. It (the security service) could be more delicate. I couldn't even see if they were blondes, brown-haired or brunettes."
The femen woman had shouted "fuck you Putin!" (not sure if it's the exact words, I translated it from an already-translated version).

71

Unban Requests / Re: UNBANNED request [BANNED]

« on: February 07, 2013, 09:50:30 pm »

There were speedboosts and instant braking.

Banned, lock the topic.

72

Suggestions / A IV mode without kills... ?

« on: January 08, 2013, 08:43:37 pm »

I've come up with an idea that could be useful for long IV races (not short ones imo), there could be a few difficulties to code? and improvements to do to my idea, I'll try to explain it clearly:

Instead of getting killed when your HP is empty, you get teleported behind... For examply 5 CPs back (with no car, and maybe if possible for a few sec you have god mode so you're not instantly killed again with deagle), the number of CPs could change depending on the race, or be like first kill = 3 Cp, 2nd kill = 4CP... And when you respawn a bit behind, you have to use /NC (so /NC would have to be possible)

Also, another idea (might be hard to code) is that, if you choose not to always be a driver, after getting killed if it detects a driver with no shooter a few CPs back, you get teleported to him, otherwise you don't.
For example: I get killed after CP 62, it's my first death so I should be teleported 3 CPs behind, to CP 59. Player B is currently at CP 57 with no shooter, teleport me to him? But if Player B is at CP 60 (kinda unfair, maybe even CP 59 is unfair because of momentum), don't teleport me to him, or at CP 55 (too far from CP 59).

Hope it was clear enough, if the idea could be improved and coded that would be nice, particularly on some IV races where it's hard to reach the end without getting killed.

73

Unban Requests / Re: Mikael "Teleport haks" or hitchhiking?

« on: December 23, 2012, 12:56:26 am »

The car seemed too far to be able to get in it, but after discussing with other admins I say maybe I was mistaken and there was a really bad synchronisation, and so OK for an unban.

74

AdrenalineX Football Championship / Final results

« on: December 05, 2012, 12:06:03 am »

Due to the inactivity, the event is now finished!

#	Team	PTS	W	D	L	GF	GA	GP
1	A to the Z	12	4	0	0	28	5	4
2	Real Andreas	6	2	0	1	14	9	3
3	I'm not sure	3	1	0	0	3	2	1
4	V for Vaffanculo	3	1	0	3	8	21	4
5	[LSR]	0	0	0	1	0	4	1
6	Project AX	0	0	0	3	3	15	3

Winner: A to the Z
(not like anybody else was expected to win )

Although we didn't finish it, I'm quite satisfied by the event (first time we do a non-racing event, so it was more of a beta test to see how it goes), if anybody else want to re-organize a similar event by modifying a few stuffs, feel free (I probably won't have much time to do it again for a while).

75

AdrenalineX Development / Re: Help Translate AdrenalineX (Updated 28/11/12)

« on: November 28, 2012, 09:34:11 pm »

.