since you seem all about assumptions, let me clear it up for you: i dont hate MTA, i hate playing on it personally, i hate the fact that "competitive" events are still being held on an inferior platform (you can argue that "its just for fun", but isnt the objective of a race winning it?) and that theyre being held on FIFTY fps, 15 years after the games release.
pretty naive of you to think that im the first ever racer to hate playing on MTA, i can assure you theres plenty of skilled samp players that dislike playing on MTA, but why would they go around voicing that? in the end its pointless debating which of two dead games is "better" (yes, in my eyes theyre two different games). in your deluded vision everyone loves MTA, so tell me, why do MTA players keep coming to SAMP, yet no SAMP players bother to get good in MTA? ill reveal the answer for you: theres ZERO incentive to play MTA, on AX the handling is better, the races are better, the players are better (dont get triggered yet).
its easy to throw around those simple terms, but what does "harder" gameplay really mean when youre throwing away the consistency of your vehicle, the very basis of your performance, and for the benefit of what? "harder" gameplay? being forced to go slower and being afraid of every little change in terrain is not difficulty to me. on SAMP your potential is unlocked, which i think is why people keep coming here, if the race is good the outcome is decided solely by you, not by wonky physics. the only MTA player thats ever impressed me on here wasnt anything worth noting when he came here, but now hes somehow doing damage. but what can you tell me about that anyway as someone who is nothing special on either platform?
i think both platforms have good players, i dont claim to be able to come on MTA and wreck everyone, neither am i interested in doing it, because as i said theyre two different games to me, so you can refrain from "challenging" me again
