Poll

Unban Runty?

Yes
18 (33.3%)
Yes on monitored trial
8 (14.8%)
Maybe, depends....
3 (5.6%)
No, could be convinced
9 (16.7%)
Not a chance in hell
16 (29.6%)

Total Members Voted: 54

« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 [12] 13   Go Down

Author Topic: here  (Read 42650 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Stacey

  • Posts: 131
    • View Profile
Re: here
« Reply #165 on: February 13, 2012, 12:42:57 am »
You really have failed to realise why i have picked out your poor reasoning...

it links back to runty, how his insults are taken as humour....

i'm sure you will reply back  :L
Logged

Offline Stacey

  • Posts: 131
    • View Profile
Re: here
« Reply #166 on: February 13, 2012, 01:11:22 am »
awww baby goes to sleeep awhhh
Logged

Offline ǝǝǝoſ[sXɐ]

  • Admin
  • Posts: 2,112
    • View Profile
  • In-game name: Joeee
Re: here
« Reply #167 on: February 13, 2012, 01:18:06 am »
Quote from: Stacey on February 13, 2012, 01:11:22 am
awww baby goes to sleeep awhhh

And is that not also provocative behavior? This is what Tom got banned for, which is my point.
Logged

Offline [MAF]Snoopy

  • Posts: 14,540
    • View Profile
Re: here
« Reply #168 on: February 13, 2012, 01:46:59 am »
Quote from: Stacey on February 13, 2012, 12:19:58 am
and arguing lol

heh that's what he's looking for joe. trying to make me reply to him so it makes me look like a hypocrite. good job i am replying to you only :)
Logged

Offline ǝǝǝoſ[sXɐ]

  • Admin
  • Posts: 2,112
    • View Profile
  • In-game name: Joeee
Re: here
« Reply #169 on: February 13, 2012, 02:10:26 am »
Which would suggest that Stacey is the actual hypocrite.
« Last Edit: February 13, 2012, 02:15:21 am by [aXs]Joeee »
Logged

Offline [MAF]Vertigo

  • Admin
  • Posts: 3,435
  • lol
    • View Profile
Re: here
« Reply #170 on: February 13, 2012, 04:48:57 am »
What a fun thread. Runty won't be unbanned, lock?
Logged

Offline ǝǝǝoſ[sXɐ]

  • Admin
  • Posts: 2,112
    • View Profile
  • In-game name: Joeee
Re: here
« Reply #171 on: February 13, 2012, 05:35:27 am »
So, the server's main coder and leader wants Tom unbanned. Half of the server are against the decision, and the poll is in favour of an unban. Ush's decision has caused more controversy than most other bans combined, and for good reason. Yet you still say that?

Saying he's not getting unbanned and then simply locking the thread would be totally ignoring the views of the majority of the server, which is completely unfair.
Logged

Offline [MAF]PyroFox

  • Leader
  • Posts: 1,426
  • ¯\(°_o)/¯
    • View Profile
Re: here
« Reply #172 on: February 13, 2012, 07:51:01 am »
I'm tired of this, lilrunty will be unbanned, date undetermined. We will keep you informed, locked.
« Last Edit: February 13, 2012, 07:53:54 am by [MAF]PyroFox »
Logged

Offline [FSR]Ush

  • Admin
  • Posts: 13,449
  • Aart
    • View Profile
Re: here
« Reply #173 on: February 14, 2012, 12:39:28 am »
We have talked as an admin team and decided the following which I will write as a quote of the admin team. This must be seen as a compromise.

Quote from:  Ax Admin Team
We decided as admin team that lilrunty will be unbanned at the 27th of april 2012. @runty, this will be your last chance, we hope you change your behaviour towards a bit more neutral point. Thanks in advance.
Logged

Offline [MAF]mooman

  • Leader
  • Posts: 6,299
    • View Profile
Re: here
« Reply #174 on: February 25, 2012, 11:09:21 am »
all 3 server leaders have agreed that runty was *this time* banned unjustly and so he has been unbanned. not because of this poll but because provoking someone is not against the rules. if anyone feels it should be against the rules then feel free to make that suggestion but it isn't at the moment and so no one should be banned for it.
Logged
will read and answer your forum PMs when I'm less busy!

Offline [MAF]Snoopy

  • Posts: 14,540
    • View Profile
Re: here
« Reply #175 on: February 25, 2012, 11:25:16 am »
let's hope he doesn't blow this chance and make us defenders look stupid :(

give him a chatbox mute and only let him talk via groupchat and pm?

or just give him /announce xDDDDDDDDDDDDD
Logged

Offline ǝǝǝoſ[sXɐ]

  • Admin
  • Posts: 2,112
    • View Profile
  • In-game name: Joeee
Re: here
« Reply #176 on: February 25, 2012, 12:56:30 pm »
Woooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1111111111111111111111111111
Logged

Offline [FSR]Ush

  • Admin
  • Posts: 13,449
  • Aart
    • View Profile
Re: here
« Reply #177 on: February 25, 2012, 01:01:20 pm »
woo thx for backstabbing me
Logged

Offline ǝǝǝoſ[sXɐ]

  • Admin
  • Posts: 2,112
    • View Profile
  • In-game name: Joeee
Re: here
« Reply #178 on: February 25, 2012, 01:02:04 pm »
np
Logged

Offline [FSR]Ush

  • Admin
  • Posts: 13,449
  • Aart
    • View Profile
Re: here
« Reply #179 on: February 25, 2012, 01:07:27 pm »
Quote from: [MAF]mooman on February 25, 2012, 11:09:21 am
all 3 server leaders have agreed that runty was *this time* banned unjustly and so he has been unbanned. not because of this poll but because provoking someone is not against the rules. if anyone feels it should be against the rules then feel free to make that suggestion but it isn't at the moment and so no one should be banned for it.

it is a rule now.

and backstabbing is another rule now. thx for informing me this way.
Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 [12] 13   Go Up
« previous next »