Author Topic: highscore web  (Read 27427 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline RayCarter

  • Posts: 34
    • View Profile
highscore web
« on: March 15, 2010, 04:46:33 am »
highscore was looking at right now, I have an idea for highscore Site.

this is my idea: another leaderboard just for records (top1)
the top1 is a point. but only the top1.

Because this is funny: 13) [SC]phil_ivey 6851

                                5) [eternal] [Babar] 12319
ivey is a very good racer, and eternal is bad

leaderboard top100 records

eg: 1) [UK] snoopy 654
     2) [FSR] devil666 549
    3) [UK] Malysz 450
    4) Madmax 421
    5 )....
    6 )....
     7 )....


I'm sure it would not be in this  leaderboard,[eternal][badar]  :D



wanted to put in suggestions but I can not.

Offline [MAF]Snoopy

  • Posts: 14,540
    • View Profile
Re: highscore web
« Reply #1 on: March 15, 2010, 11:49:23 am »
hmm quite true about the shit players getting above the better players
i'd be pissed if some noob got above me lol
« Last Edit: March 15, 2010, 11:51:21 am by [UK]Snoopy »

Offline [MAF]mooman

  • Leader
  • Posts: 6,299
    • View Profile
Re: highscore web
« Reply #2 on: March 15, 2010, 11:53:18 am »
good idea ray. i agree that the current system isn't fair. when we had only 5 records the points were:
1st = 5 points
2nd = 4 points
3rd = 3 points
4th = 2 points
5th = 1 point

this meant that the first record was 2.5x the 4th record when now it is only 1.17x (20 points for first, 17 for fourth).

here's my idea for a new point system:

1=50
2=40
3=30
4=20
5=18
6=16
7=14
8=13
9=12
10=11
11=10
12=9
13=8
14=7
15=6
16=5
17=4
18=3
19=2
20=1

i don't think 2 #10 records should give you the same amount of points as 1 #1 one and this should fix that

what does everyone think?
will read and answer your forum PMs when I'm less busy!

Offline [MAF]Snoopy

  • Posts: 14,540
    • View Profile
Re: highscore web
« Reply #3 on: March 15, 2010, 12:00:39 pm »
i'll go with that :p

Offline [MAF]Rac3r

  • Leader
  • Posts: 2,807
  • Well, this is embarrassing.
    • View Profile
Re: highscore web
« Reply #4 on: March 15, 2010, 12:07:28 pm »
Sorry but this is bullshit. Nothing against change, but Dabar is ranked higher because he actual plays at the server.

Phil, regardless of his ability hardly ever plays. Can't remember the last time I seen him.

People who don't play often will never get ranked high because there is so many races. Change in the points system won't help.

Offline [MAF]Snoopy

  • Posts: 14,540
    • View Profile
Re: highscore web
« Reply #5 on: March 15, 2010, 12:13:35 pm »
bleh why did it have to change anyway, i think most people were just fine with the top5 =/

i think myself and most other people were comfortable with the classic top5
« Last Edit: March 15, 2010, 12:15:55 pm by [UK]Snoopy »

Offline [MAF]mooman

  • Leader
  • Posts: 6,299
    • View Profile
Re: highscore web
« Reply #6 on: March 15, 2010, 12:43:07 pm »
i think people who get #1 recs should be at the top of the leaderboard, not people who just play a lot. quality over quantity :p
will read and answer your forum PMs when I'm less busy!

Offline [MAF]Snoopy

  • Posts: 14,540
    • View Profile
Re: highscore web
« Reply #7 on: March 15, 2010, 12:44:38 pm »
+1

Offline [MAF]Sighmoan

  • Admin
  • Posts: 1,599
    • View Profile
Re: highscore web
« Reply #8 on: March 15, 2010, 12:49:34 pm »
I think top 20 is fine, it is less elitist and allows more players to get records, which is a good thing.

How about a pro highscore table that only included top 5 records?

Or break up the whole highscore page and separate it by game mode, with each one being on a tab (Classic, SK, IV etc)?

Offline [MAF]Cthulhu

  • Admin
  • Posts: 6,331
  • Trance, Progressive, Techno <3
    • View Profile
  • In-game name: [MAF]Phobos
Re: highscore web
« Reply #9 on: March 15, 2010, 01:28:50 pm »
i think people who get #1 recs should be at the top of the leaderboard, not people who just play a lot. quality over quantity :p
agree with that  :P

Offline [FSR]Ush

  • Admin
  • Posts: 13,449
  • Aart
    • View Profile
Re: highscore web
« Reply #10 on: March 15, 2010, 02:14:53 pm »
i think people who get #1 recs should be at the top of the leaderboard, not people who just play a lot. quality over quantity :p
agree with that  :P

Same, it's like the new F1 point system.. More fair if you win a race.

Offline [2F2F]SNiKeRiS

  • Admin
  • Posts: 3,892
    • View Profile
    • 2F2F website
Re: highscore web
« Reply #11 on: March 15, 2010, 02:18:54 pm »
^ wanted to quote that  ;D With old high scores system i was trying to reach falky and M4. Now i have to reach some novice players who made their way to top10 easier while i was beating records very hard.  :-\

Offline [FSR]Ush

  • Admin
  • Posts: 13,449
  • Aart
    • View Profile
Re: highscore web
« Reply #12 on: March 15, 2010, 03:00:49 pm »
30) [FSR]Ush 4240
31) Richard_Burns 4185
32) [FSR]RenatO 3704

:L

Offline [MAF]Snoopy

  • Posts: 14,540
    • View Profile
Re: highscore web
« Reply #13 on: March 15, 2010, 05:20:04 pm »
it's way too easy to get records now imo

Offline ﱡ קּﻰﺢ Love

  • Admin
  • Posts: 1,936
  • Elements of life: Air, Water, Oil, Fuel
    • View Profile
    • LSR Forum
Re: highscore web
« Reply #14 on: March 15, 2010, 07:41:49 pm »
Agree with quality over quantity.But the thing is a goal to run on, about newbies/medicore playas.20 spot for records will create a better competition and little more fun for medicore people who cant finish higher than 8-10th.
Same, it's like the new F1 point system.. More fair if you win a race.
So do something like that, be more rewarding for higher places.I dont know the new point system in F1 but sure they made something nice lol
Sign-A-True